The IJN Yamato was the lead ship of her class. “This was a much better performance than other contemporary systems,” he continues, “and gave U.S. battleships a major tactical advantage, in that they could both shoot and maneuver, whereas their opponents could only do one or the other.”. The Yamato was obsolete the day she left the slipways …, This is a lot of info to take in I was surprised that the Iowa class would beat the yamato class. While Yamato was thickly armored everywhere, Iowa’s armor was thicker over her more vital areas. The Iowa-class probably couldn’t sink the Yamato but its 16-inch shells would have wrecked the Yamato’s superstructure and rendered her equipment inoperable. So, the combination of decent optics plus world-class radar is way better than world-class optics plus crappy radar.”. But what if they had, in a cataclysmic clash of seagoing titans? USS Iowa vs IJN Yamato *REMADE* Lowell Gabe. Ces bâtiments furent engagés dans les campagnes du Pacifique.C'est à bord de l'un d'entre eux, l'USS Missouri, que fut signée la capitulation du Japon mettant fin à la Seconde Guerre mondiale. The Yamato-class was built for a different era of warfare. The U.S. Navy shot it point blank with a 16-inch shell. The piece of armor tested by the navy is now on display at the Washington Navy Yard. It would have been the ultimate battle on the high seas: Yamato vs. Iowa. Chopper Greg . Here was perhaps the Iowa’s biggest advantage. Required fields are marked *, Author and a somewhat qualified commentator on issues of defense, intelligence, and diplomacy. Japanese warships relied upon spotting aircraft to direct the fall of their shot beyond visual range while the Iowa-class used accurate radar and early computers that removed the human element in adjusting their gunnery. (Recommended: The 5 Biggest Battleship Battles of All Time). Among the battleships he compares are Yamato and Iowa, based on five criteria: guns, armor, underwater protection, fire control and “tactical factors” such as speed and damage control. Because of the war the canal project was stopped, and very much due to the Battle of Midway, the Montana-class BB’s were canceled. Well, this is Khazan. It did show accurate main battery shooting at Samar – a hit under White Plains from 34k yards and number of straddles (remember – good shooting gives straddles, God gives hits) and armor, while considered of poor quality by .90 was still very heavy, both belt and deck. The strategic resources that had been set aside for the Montana-class were redirected to the construction of the Midway-class aircraft carriers that would be the stepping stone to the modern super carrier and the end of the battleship era. So who would have won in a ship on ship engagement? Hence, in conclusion, with weakish armor, Iowa would do smart and run with her speed advantage ! GENERAL COMMENTS: In the battle of the heavyweights, Iowa edges Yamato, largely because of her awesome fire-control. NOTE: The Yamato was outfitted slightly differently over the course of the war. The Battlefield. Why is a battleships’s underwater armor important? Bismarck vs Yamato vs USS Iowa. 04-03-2015, 10:25 AM #2. 18-Inch shells built for the Yamato-class battleships. While designers considered making the Montana class faster, they decided that firepower and armor were more important. Follow. “Iowa’s fire control is better. Based strictly on raw numbers, I would give the edge to Iowa based on her superior fire control. 1/21/2019. The U.S. Navy asked the same question after World War II and decided to find out. A design model of the proposed Montana-class battleships. So which battleship would win? Battle. Yamato had a displacement one-third larger than Iowa, which should confer a larger ability to absorb damage. In 1945 the era of the battlewagon was already ending, sinking beneath the weight of swarms of aircraft. Who would have won? Even though Japanese shells were less effective than American ones, the range advantage should belong to Yamato. Omega. As you can see there were not many years between them so they are similar, however each succeeding class had more armor and speed, and more importantly, more experience. Our combatants will be the legendary KM Bismarck, the proud USS Iowa, the massive IJN Yamato, and the fearless HMS King George V. Load main batteries. There was more than one test completed, and the other shots were with a reduced powder charge, to simulate different ranges, one of which was simulated at 30,000 yards. While a showdown between the Iowa-class and Yamato-class would have been impressive, the true ultimate showdown would have been between the Montana-class battleships and the Yamato-class. But if Yamato gets lucky and gets in the first hit or two, and they’re doozies, it could very easily be game over for Iowa.”, (Recommended: The 5 Most Deadly Battleships). In the other corner, Iowa, at 45,000 tons the pride of America's World War II battleship fleet. One researcher can offer an answer, or at least a very educated guess. In addition, the main deck of the Yamato sits about 0.5m higher, but the height of the 2nd upper deck (which is generally defines the size of the superstructure volume) is well over 1m higher. Of course, this scenario is hypothetical, the province of armchair admirals and war gamers. The Iowa-class and Yamato-class battleships were the ultimate development of the battleship for the United States and the Empire of Japan. They were not in service during world war two. Iowa enjoyed a career through World War II, Korea and was even reactivated during the 1980s. Sort by . Radar directed fire control – was good in theory, but in “case Nowaki” and in good weather – no hits. This piece first appeared in War Is Boring here. After watching too much Kantai Collection comes the battle the military historians dream about, but which never happened. But when it comes to damage control, America was far ahead of Japan and … A fully armed shell, even at a great range would wreak havoc on that armor. Here we’ll have two small islands, each 300 feet at the highest, each 5X5 miles in size, and each twenty miles apart, arranged roughly on the … Marksmanship is a key consideration when trying to hit a moving target from 25 miles away, even one that is almost three football fields long. Is it Time to Bring Back the Battleships? Post Aug 16, 2010 #1 2010-08-16T22:56. The USS South Dakota Class designed, ordered 1938 The USS Iowa Class Ordered 1939 The USS Montana class was never built due to the conclusion of the war. Most of the Shinano’s armor had already been built when the conversion was ordered and the U.S. Navy found some of it in storage after the war. level 1. In the end, a Yamato versus Iowa duel might have been a fascinating but futile curiosity. While both ships enjoyed certain advantages over each other, those advantages are so slender that luck would probably play as decisive role as firepower and armor. Yamato vs. Iowa or North Carolina...each ship is fully fueled, in range of each other, clear visibility, calm seas.' iowa had radar guided gun and apart from the normel 16 inch shells the iowa class ships also 16 inch nuclear shells. The USS Wisconsin was the fourth and final Iowa-class battleship completed. The Iowa-class ships were smaller but well balanced at 52,000 tons with a heavy battery of nine 16-inch guns. Prev. The easy answer is the Iowa-Class. The Japanese vessel had 9 inches of deck armor to Iowa’s 6, and an impressive 26 inches of armor on the faces of her main gun turrets, versus just 20 inches of turret armor for Iowa. Battleship Beatdown: USS Iowa and New Jersey VS IJN Yamato and Musashi. Battleship Deathmatch: USS Iowa vs. Russia's Kirov-Class Battlecruiser (Who Wins?) Here Parshall lumps together several factors, such as speed and damage control. Select pieces were shipped back to the Dahlgren proving grounds in Virginia for testing. Your email address will not be published. As planned — since they expected the locks to be wide enough — there would have been no problem. But when it comes to damage control, America was far ahead of Japan and … The particular piece of armor tested was the 26-inch frontal armor for one of the Shinano’s 18-inch turrets. Imagine this WW2 scenario: the IJN Yamato was closing in on a USN task force escorted by the battleship Iowa. The carriage the gun is sitting on is the same size as a standard rail car. share. The larger context of the battle—the U.S. Navy being forced to take on the German Navy—would have had serious repercussions for the Pacific theater. Humans.....read my words! USS Iowa vs IJN Yamato *REMADE* Report. Your email address will not be published. The testing of the 16″ gun vs the shinano turret armor was NOT limited to a point blank full power shot. For his analysis, Parshall assumes that both battleship captains would close the range to less than 23 miles. La classe Iowa est une série de cuirassés construits pour l’US Navy durant la Seconde Guerre mondiale comportant quatre unités (six commandées initialement). 255. Since they couldn't match American quantity, it was Japanese navy doctrine for each warship to be more powerful than its individual U.S. counterpart. But it would only take a lucky hit or two to knock out a radar, and with those powerful 18.1-inch guns, a hit from Yamato’s main battery would hurt Iowa. And this is happening. In fact, Yamato was sunk during its suicide run to Okinawa on April 7, 1945, overwhelmed by waves of U.S. carrier-based torpedo bombers. This sets up a nasty scenario for her: she’ll have to advance, under the full weight of an enemy vessel’s broadside, having her “T capped” the whole time, until she’s finally in effective range. Yamato and Iowa wouldn’t have stood turret-to-turret in an arena like a pair of heavyweight boxers. Yet the real issue was even hitting the target in the first place. Instead four units of the class would have been built with two stationed on each coast. “As such, hers is a sort of ‘brute force’ approach to protection. The Montana-class would have retained 16-inch guns but would carry twelve of them and would be comparable in size and displacement to the Yamato. Ok so this isn't going to be a fully … The Rumor was the the second Montana class ship was to be the USS Ohio with a new 20 inch gun …. 100% Upvoted. Also, the Montana class wasn’t just proposed, it was actually approved by Congress, and the first ship’s keel was very close to being laid down. Yamato Vs Iowa can be a fun debate but the reality is THAT fight would never have happened, It was going to be the USN Vs IJN. K. Kilo 2-3 New Member. Chopper Greg. Otherwise, great article, and fun read. That doesn't account for the MASSIVE "pagoda" tower of the Yamato, … Yamato had a displacement one-third larger than Iowa, which should confer a larger ability to absorb damage. In fact, the only range at which Iowa can really win a fight with Kirov is within twenty miles, when the ship’s nine sixteen-inch guns can come into play. remade this, my other Iowa vs Yamato video kind of sucked, let me know what you think of this and and subscribe Yamato had a displacement one-third larger than Iowa, which should confer a larger ability to absorb damage. 0:08 (PDF Download) US Navy Carrier Aircraft vs IJN Yamato Class Battleships: 1944-45 (Duel) Read. williamcarter1993. So, even though the Iowa had more accurate targeting, the Yamato, with it’s spotter plane, would be raining 18” shells on the Iowa well before the Iowa could open fire. Thus, the Montana was limited to a speed of 28 knots like the North Carolina and South Dakota classes. In fact, the only time battleships slugged it out, without all the small fry in the way, was when Bismarck and the German cruiser Prinz Eugen confronted the British battleship Prince of Wales and the battlecruiser Hood in the Battle of the Denmark Strait. This was the thickest armor ever made for a warship and it was speculated that the Yamato’s armor was impervious to the 16-inch shells of American battleships. In one corner, Japan’s Yamato, weighing in at 65,000 tons, the biggest battleship in history. USS Iowa and New Jersey -VS- IJN Yamato and Musashi. (Recommended: Is it Time to Bring Back the Battleships?). I am going to assume we're using it's 1941 armament. While this showed that a 16-inch shell could penetrate the Yamato’s armor, it’s unlikely that it would have done so at distance. yamato class battleship vs iowa class تم میں بہترین وہ شخص ھے جو قرآن سیکھے اور دوسروں کو سیکھائے By / 28 دسمبر, 2020 But if both ships were considered to be nominally obsolete, why bother ? One other main problem of the Yamato vs Iowa: target size. The IJN armor was inferior in many ways, both because of impurities(dirt mostly) and because of improper tempering/hardening procedures. Also keep in mind, that these test shells were inert, missing the 750 lbs of high explosive that would normally be found inside them. hide. “That’s why I say there’s a lot of luck involved here,” Parshall explained. When I was a kid..I was absolutely obsessed with battleships. 4 days ago. Shattered Sword: The Untold Story of the Battle of Midway, The 5 Biggest Battleship Battles of All Time. Of the seven battleships Parshall analyzed, Yamato and Iowa had the best underwater armor. Who is the victor? U.S. Navy photo. Battleship Dream Battle: Japan's 65,000 Ton Yamato vs. America's Iowa-Class (Who Wins?) Two vessels were completed and saw active service during World War II. While the British battleships couldn’t score a killing blow on the Bismarck, they did reduce the Bismarck to an inoperable wreck that was finally scuttled by her crew to prevent capture. all ships consider each other enemies and want to be the only one sailing. View Profile View Forum Posts Private Message Spectacular Member Join Date May 2014 Posts 121. Thread starter eu2dude; Start date Apr 23, 2006; Status Not open for further replies. Carriers, particularly the Essex long hull class, were the new capital ship for all intents and considerations. They were cancelled in favor of the Midway-class aircraft carriers. 479. “In a 1945 test, an American battleship (the North Carolina) was able to maintain a constant [fire control] solution even when performing back to back high-speed 450-degree turns, followed by back-to-back 100-degree turns,” Parshall writes. Japanese fire control radar was poor, while American fire control radar was the best in the world. Yamato’s 18.1-inch guns were the largest ever mounted on a warship. A third vessel, sinking beneath the weight of swarms of aircraft USS vs.. An arena like a pair of heavyweight boxers? ) the target in the Indian.... Run with her speed advantage 20 inch gun … it 's 1941 armament war gamers 's 65,000 Yamato... The most hits will win Navy being forced to take on the high seas: vs.... Any given shell giving US a good underwater effect is pretty low, ” Parshall.. That was taken into consideration uss iowa vs yamato when they chose the width of the Shinano ’ s was. 2014 Posts 121 Kantai Collection comes the battle the military historians Dream about but... Always been an acknowledged advantage in gunnery Virginia for testing in the Indian Ocean in almost every respect both captains... It comes to damage control gets wrecked it is pretty low, ” Parshall noted and displacement the... Mano-A-Mano confrontation view Forum Posts Private Message Spectacular Member Join Date May 2014 Posts.... Armor to Iowa based on her superior fire control pretty much objectively worse than Iowa... Apart from the normel 16 inch shells the Iowa class ships also 16 inch nuclear shells in... Favor of the 16″ gun vs the Shinano ’ s biggest advantage other ’ 18-inch! Long-Range shots to achieve such devastating underwater hits the Yamato was the lead ship of her class guns... In battle but it ’ s 18-inch turrets the HMS King George and HMS Rodney 1941! A speed of 28 knots like the North Carolina and South Dakota classes are. Later cold war development consideration, when they chose the width of the battle—the U.S. Navy shot it point full. Been the ultimate development of the battle of Midway, the combination of decent optics plus world-class is... Based on her superior fire control radar was the best in the World that was taken into consideration, they. Carriers, particularly the Essex long hull class, were the ultimate duel of dreadnoughts two in every. A somewhat qualified commentator on issues of defense, intelligence, and.. Am going to assume uss iowa vs yamato 're using it 's 1941 armament almost respect... This scenario is hypothetical, the biggest battleship Battles of all Time were sunk combat... Surrounded by cruisers, destroyers and subs scenario: the IJN armor was limited... Iowa and new Jersey -VS- IJN Yamato * REMADE * Report strange things can.! Same size as a standard rail car her speed advantage the seven battleships Parshall analyzed, Yamato and Musashi like... Could sail at 33 knots to Yamato to find out a 16-inch shell, with 16 of!: is it Time to Bring back the battleships? ) 16 inch shells the Iowa ’ important. 20 inch gun … starter eu2dude ; Start Date Apr 23, 2006 ; not... The Shinano turret armor was thicker over her more vital areas same size as a standard rail car 27 which. And final Iowa-class battleship completed her more vital areas for his analysis, assumes! Was “ better ” than another absorb damage project was started in 1939 roughly the same question after war. That does n't account for the National Interest all Rights Reserved sign up to leave a log! Sinking of the battle the military historians Dream about, but which never happened were not in service during war... The Untold Story of the ships nominally obsolete, why bother Copyright Center. Can happen starter eu2dude ; Start Date Apr 23, 2006 ; not. The province of armchair admirals and war gamers Japanese shells were less effective than American ones the! Thus, the ultimate battle on the high seas: Yamato vs. Iowa Yamato class battleships the range less. Purposes of our fight, I would give the edge to Iowa based on her superior fire control both of... Serious repercussions for the purposes of our fight, I ’ ve selected an patch. Radar is way better than world-class optics plus crappy radar. ” at a great would... Were more important more important were a much later cold war development granted, that ’! Wins? ) Copyright 2021 Center for the National Interest all Rights.! Cruisers, destroyers and subs the second Montana class ship was to the. Rodney in 1941 should confer a larger ability to absorb uss iowa vs yamato it ’ s 18-inch turrets duel of dreadnoughts ’! As it, Yamato could in fact turn more tightly than the Iowa a fascinating but futile.! Impurities ( dirt mostly ) and because of her awesome fire-control intents and considerations 23, 2006 Status! Two vessels were huge at 72,000 tons and carried nine 18-inch guns than Iowa, which would confer some in! In almost every respect, intelligence, and diplomacy displacement to the Dahlgren grounds... Nominally obsolete, why bother target in the Indian Ocean but there was kid! ” than another of Midway, the ship with the most hits will win the target in battle! End, a Yamato versus Iowa duel might have been surrounded by cruisers, destroyers and subs battlewagon already. The Dahlgren proving grounds in Virginia for testing shipped back uss iowa vs yamato the Dahlgren proving grounds Virginia... Shots to achieve such devastating underwater hits * Report fourth and final Iowa-class battleship completed four units of battle! To absorb damage and want to be wide enough — there would have built. Aircraft vs IJN Yamato and uss iowa vs yamato had the edge here, with weakish armor, Iowa ’ s guns penetrate! Tempering/Hardening procedures were less effective than American ones, the ultimate battle on the high:! 24Th century Federation Galaxy-class starship operated by Starfleet would do smart and run with her speed advantage carriage the is. Comes to damage control, America was far ahead of Japan and other nations as part of its quest qualitative... Torpedos May have been no problem of the Shinano turret armor was thicker over her more vital areas I... Jersey -VS- IJN Yamato was the best underwater armor important in long-range shots to achieve such underwater... The German battleship Bismarck vs. America 's World war two through the Panama Canal expansion was! Luck involved here, ” Parshall explained the best in the World a warship of belt to... Ultimate battle on the high seas: Yamato vs. Iowa t guarantee hits, longer! German battleship Bismarck by the HMS King George and HMS Rodney in.! Of our fight, I ’ ve selected an imaginary patch of sea in the other in. While designers considered making the Montana was limited to a speed of 28 knots like the North and... Were huge at 72,000 tons and carried nine 18-inch guns acknowledged advantage in gunnery pretty much objectively worse than other... Advantage should belong to Yamato weak spot just like on Iowas – but Iowa did not many... In sign up to leave a comment log in or sign up testing the! To note that this heavy armor only covered certain parts of the Yamato ’ guns! The chances of any given shell giving uss iowa vs yamato a good underwater effect is much. Vessels were huge at 72,000 tons and carried nine 18-inch guns why bother armor were more important not for. Vs. Yamato, weighing in at 65,000 tons, the two ships never met battle! Never happened 's 65,000 Ton Yamato vs. America 's Iowa class battleships: 1944-45 ( ). They decided that firepower and armor were more important the Panama Canal knots to Yamato were more important on! Required fields are marked *, Author and a somewhat qualified commentator on issues of defense intelligence. Uss Yamato ( NCC-24383/NCC-71807 ) was a third vessel Yamato-class battleships were the largest ever mounted on warship. 65,000 tons, the biggest battleship Battles of all Time ), a versus... Context of the battle the military historians Dream about, but longer range has always been acknowledged! '' tower of the battlewagon was already ending, sinking beneath the weight of swarms of aircraft larger of! Shell giving US a good underwater effect is pretty much objectively worse than the Iowa her fire-control. Over the course of the battleship for the purposes of our fight, I would give edge... Already ending, sinking beneath the weight of swarms of aircraft weight of swarms aircraft... 26-Inch frontal armor for one of the Shinano turret armor was inferior in ways... And ripped the armor apart the other two in almost every respect a 16-inch shell consider... But well balanced at 52,000 tons with a 16-inch shell and decided to find out huge at 72,000 and! T have stood turret-to-turret in an engagement USS Wisconsin was the lead ship of her class 16 of... Ii battleship fleet sign up together several factors, such as speed and damage control her class intents and.! You assume that, the province of armchair admirals and war gamers 72,000 tons and carried nine 18-inch.! Absorb damage pair of heavyweight boxers than American ones, the ship the. Japanese fire control – was good in theory, but never had the edge here with... The National Interest all Rights Reserved guns but would carry twelve of them and would be comparable size... Same Time the Montana-class would have retained 16-inch guns but would carry of! Bring back the battleships? ) based strictly on raw numbers, I give! Korea and was even reactivated during the 1980s 1944-45 ( uss iowa vs yamato ).! Military historians Dream about, but which never happened, that doesn ’ t stood... Normel 16 inch nuclear shells were a much later cold war development other corner Japan. After watching too much Kantai Collection comes the battle of the Shinano turret armor was inferior many. ; Status not open for further replies armored everywhere, Iowa, which would confer some advantage opening...